|
Both Peer-to-peer
and Client-server network architectures have their advantages and
disadvantages. On balance, however, a Client-server configuration
is preferable to peer-to-peer, especially in a small business environment
where there is an expectation of growth.
The upside of the Peer-to-peer is that it is relatively inexpensive and fairly simple to set up and manage. The flip side is that it is limited in extensibility, tends to overburden user workstations by having them play the role of server to other users, is largely unsecured, and is typically unable to provide system-wide services since the typical workstation will run a standard desktop operating system incapable of hosting any major service (e.g., a post office). The upside of the Client-server is that it can extend to handle organizational growth, allows user workstations to function as unburdened clients, can provide sophisticated system-wide services, and is configurable for maximum security. The downside is obvious: higher initial capital investment to establish, and a greater level of technology expertise required to configure and manage, as compared to the vanilla peer-to-peer network. So, which to pick? ~
Choosing between the peer-to-peer and client-server network architectures can be daunting in light of the ups and downs of each type. Perhaps the following simple rules of thumb may provide some help: A peer-to-peer network is often a reasonable choice in a home network, or other environment where significant growth in numbers of users or quantity of computer-based work is not expected, where security is not a serious concern, and where there is little or no need for major system-wide services. The client-server architecture is usually the correct choice, even in a small business, where growth is anticipated, security matters, and sophisticated server-based services will be beneficial to productivity. Well, why not start off with a peer-to-peer network architecture and then move up to client-server when the time comes? Because, unless there is some overwhelming consideration to the contrary, it is likely more cost-effective and productivity-effective to begin with client-server, despite the initial cost difference. |
|
If you require more information please don't hesitate in contacting us HERE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Return
to Network Solutions |
Copyright© - Internet Xtreme | Disclaimer | Contact Webmaster |